<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Glover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidglover.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidglover.org</link>
	<description>What is this I don&#039;t even</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Using Panasonic 700-series 50/60fps video on the Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/06/using-panasonic-700-series-5060fps-video-on-the-mac.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=using-panasonic-700-series-5060fps-video-on-the-mac</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/06/using-panasonic-700-series-5060fps-video-on-the-mac.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[how-to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidglover.org/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panasonic&#8217;s new 700-series cameras shoot in amazing 1080p50. (In the USA, 1080p60. I&#8217;ll be using the &#8220;1080p50&#8243; term in this article but everything will work the same for the 1080p60 version.) This format is slightly non-standard and difficult to use &#8230; <a href="http://www.davidglover.org/2010/06/using-panasonic-700-series-5060fps-video-on-the-mac.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panasonic&#8217;s new 700-series cameras shoot in amazing 1080p50. (In the USA, 1080p60. I&#8217;ll be using the &#8220;1080p50&#8243; term in this article but everything will work the same for the 1080p60 version.) This format is slightly non-standard and difficult to use on the Mac. The following is the result of my experiments in getting it to work.</p>
<p><em>Note: Please, no tech support questions. This is a technical article and I don&#8217;t have time to help you. Please ask elsewhere.</em></p>
<p><strong>Step 1: Converting the video to be usable</strong></p>
<p>You can use <a href="http://www.ffmpeg.org/">ffmpeg</a> to convert the files into a usable format. I built ffmpeg from source but you can use a pre-compiled binary if you can find one. Note that the version currently supplied (as of 20 June 2010) with MacPorts is too old. If your converted video shows only green and no picture, you need to use a newer ffmpeg.</p>
<p>The correct command to convert the video is:</p>
<p><code>ffmpeg -i video_from_camera.MTS -acodec pcm_s16le -vcodec mjpeg -dc 11 -qmin 1 -qscale 1 fixed_video.mov</code></p>
<p>Replace &#8220;video_from_camera&#8221; and &#8220;fixed_video&#8221; with the names of the video file from the card, and the name you want to save as, respectively. You&#8217;ll find the videos on the card in the folder PRIVATE/AVCHD/BDMV/STREAM.</p>
<p>This converts the video to motion-JPEG with PCM audio &#8211; a format which can be easily edited with most software (including, most usefully, iMovie &#8217;09) and retains the frame rate.</p>
<p>I wrote the following bash script to automatically convert all the files from the card into a folder on my hard disk:</p>
<p><code>#!/bin/bash<br />
mkdir -p ~/Movies/Camera<br />
cd /Volumes/CAM_SD/PRIVATE/AVCHD/BDMV/STREAM<br />
for f in *.MTS; do<br />
<span style="margin-left: 2em;">echo $f</span><br />
<span style="margin-left: 2em;">ffmpeg -i $f -acodec pcm_s16le -vcodec mjpeg -strict -1 -dc 11 -qmin 1 -qscale 1 ~/Movies/Camera/$(basename $f .MTS).mov</span><br />
done</code></p>
<p>Change &#8220;CAM_SD&#8221; to be the name of your card or camera.</p>
<p>The converted files end up in a folder called &#8220;Camera&#8221; inside your &#8220;Movies&#8221; folder. Make sure you rename the Camera folder before you run the script again, or it will overwrite the movies already there.</p>
<p><strong>2. Editing the video</strong></p>
<p><strong>2a. Using Final Cut Express</strong></p>
<p>Final Cut Express does not support any video greater than 30fps. You can import the video and edit it, but you will end up with 25 or 30fps upon export. The quality will still be higher than shooting in 1080i, however, so you may be happy to go this route.</p>
<p><em>Note: I&#8217;m not rich enough to own a copy of Final Cut Pro, so I don&#8217;t know anything about it. Sorry.</em></p>
<p><strong>2b. Using iMovie &#8217;09</strong></p>
<p>It is possible to keep the 50fps frame rate using iMovie.</p>
<p>Import the converted video into iMovie, and <strong>turn off the &#8220;Optimize&#8221; option</strong>. If you turn on &#8220;Optimize&#8221;, your video will be converted back to 25/30 fps.</p>
<p>If you want to preserve the high frame rate on export, you&#8217;ll need to use &#8220;Export using QuickTime&#8221; to export to MP4 and manually choose 50 (or 60) fps, or iMovie will default to 25/30.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t care about the frame rate, you can use iMovie&#8217;s other &#8220;Share&#8221; menu options, but these will convert to 25 or 30fps. You&#8217;ll still get better quality than you would if you&#8217;d shot in 1080i, so you may be happy with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/06/using-panasonic-700-series-5060fps-video-on-the-mac.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The size of the oil spill, compared to the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/the-size-of-the-oil-spill-compared-to-the-uk.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-size-of-the-oil-spill-compared-to-the-uk</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/the-size-of-the-oil-spill-compared-to-the-uk.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/the-size-of-the-oil-spill-compared-to-the-uk.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s bigger than you think. (Spill size accurate to May 31st.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='posterous_autopost'>It&#8217;s bigger than you think.
<p /> (Spill size accurate to May 31st.)
<p><a href='http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/davidcwg/o4Y0kUNqu0yMg3nlIQPFJMxrwK8G2WVEgEp3Wp5PUaS1nVspIjUYyK8AKCJX/screenshot_292.png'><img src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/davidcwg/IhM01d57QNFt7P2iPfu5Y5edVIJhNA1mJ8ldXUyshQLaNyhs3Slvfh1pc23q/screenshot_292.png.scaled.500.jpg" width="500" height="313"/></a> </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/the-size-of-the-oil-spill-compared-to-the-uk.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In 1773&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/in-1773.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=in-1773</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/in-1773.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 14:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/in-1773.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Dawes Jr: In 1773, an official of this bank unwisely loaned a large sum of money to finance a shipment of tea to the American colonies. Do you know what happened? George W. Banks: Yes, sir. Yes, I think &#8230; <a href="http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/in-1773.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='posterous_autopost'><strong>Mr. Dawes Jr</strong>: In 1773, an official of this bank unwisely loaned a large sum of money to finance a shipment of tea to the American colonies. Do you know what happened?
<p /> <strong>George W. Banks</strong>: Yes, sir. Yes, I think I do. As the ship lay anchored in Boston Harbor, a party of the colonists dressed as red Indians boarded the vessel, behaved very rudely, and threw all the tea overboard. This made the tea unsuitable for drinking. Even for Americans.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/in-1773.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vodafone have lost the plot</title>
		<link>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/vodafone-have-lost-the-plot.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=vodafone-have-lost-the-plot</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/vodafone-have-lost-the-plot.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/vodafone-have-lost-the-plot.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was only a few weeks ago that I was singing the praises of Vodafone as the best network for iPhone owners, and the network I was planning to switch to when I upgrade my aging iPhone 3G later this &#8230; <a href="http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/vodafone-have-lost-the-plot.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='posterous_autopost'>It was only a few weeks ago that I was singing the praises of Vodafone as the best network for iPhone owners, and the network I was planning to switch to when I upgrade my aging iPhone 3G later this year.
<p /> A few days ago, however, Vodafone announced that that were introducing rather draconian &#8220;fair usage policies&#8221; on their &#8220;unlimited&#8221; data plans. It&#8217;s long been known that in the mobile data world, &#8220;unlimited&#8221; has been a borderline-illegal description of a service that is anything but. Vodafone would now be charging £5 for every 500MB, or 50p for every 10MB for pre-pay customers.
<p /> But now&#8230;
<p /> Earlier today I posted a story about iPad data plans, including a screenshot (which you can still see in my previous post, and I am now glad that I took a screenshot) that listed the top Vodafone plan as &#8220;5GB&#8221;. Now, however, the same page has been changed to look like this:
<p><a href='http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/davidcwg/O6sLCcIsnScrzhiWvQjF7RrbsajF6zXYOWzqCENyjIVsclWafnpQS2g619rj/Vodafone_Unlimited.png'><img src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/davidcwg/CX4MfBuRDsGdLrU4M8ueEndworKtdwTgAxgCE0AxF1jpystd874bqOiLV6lt/Vodafone_Unlimited.png.scaled.500.jpg" width="500" height="206"/></a> </p>
<p>(Obviously, the red annotations are mine.)
<p /> This is the stupidest thing I&#8217;ve ever seen. Not only is Vodafone&#8217;s 5GB plan listed incredibly inaccurately as &#8220;Unlimited&#8221;, but right above it is Orange&#8217;s 10GB plan, for the same price, advertised accurately, and making a mockery of the whole situation.
<p /> Never before has the utter limited-ness of an &#8220;Unlimited&#8221; plan been more clear, and Vodafone deserve to suffer from this blatant example of false advertising.
<p /> My next iPhone will not be on Vodafone.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/vodafone-have-lost-the-plot.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing the iPad 3G price plans</title>
		<link>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/comparing-the-ipad-3g-price-plans.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=comparing-the-ipad-3g-price-plans</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/comparing-the-ipad-3g-price-plans.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/comparing-the-ipad-3g-price-plans.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has finally announced iPad prices in the UK, including details of the data plans for the iPad 3G. Let&#8217;s take a closer look. Many to choose from! O2 has the advantage that their SIM is bundled with the iPad, &#8230; <a href="http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/comparing-the-ipad-3g-price-plans.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='posterous_autopost'>Apple has finally announced iPad prices in the UK, including details of the data plans for the iPad 3G. Let&#8217;s take a closer look.
<p><img src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/davidcwg/ck92NjEHECrnUWJgDlW1SROv0FsbG0hEBKMnZP33sYLwEJnGqsHbGUFkdAQL/iPad_price_plans.png" width="412" height="360"/> </p>
<p>Many to choose from! O2 has the advantage that their SIM is bundled with the iPad, but on the face of it, all of these plans seem quite reasonable. It is, however, interesting to compare how much 1GB of data costs on each of these plans:</p>
<p><a href='http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/davidcwg/KARODdySQzJZ9XhyTNbylB9fDHfIZ5SWBOfgCiGudzf4llYe8rerTcVYSYAL/iPad_price_plans_graph.png'><img src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/davidcwg/qoVmYEQa29CbD4Rc6dB4Ur8WORqwm0kfXSwc9OWIkcG5uS85fwUcGWEnGa9z/iPad_price_plans_graph.png.scaled.500.jpg" width="500" height="452"/></a> </p>
<p>Suddenly larger differences appear. The Vodafone 250MB per month plan seems on the face of it to be particularly poor value, but it&#8217;s worth remembering that this graph ignores how long each plan lasts. That 250MB lasts for a month, compared to Orange&#8217;s 200MB plan which only lasts one day before you have to pay again. What you choose will have to depend on how often you expect to use 3G data.
<p /> For large amounts of data usage the Orange 10GB/month plan seems best value, so it shouldn&#8217;t be too surprising that this is also the most expensive plan, at £25 per month. It compares well with the Vodafone 5GB per month plan, however, which costs exactly the same but only gets you half as much data.
<p /> The final factor worth considering is coverage. Orange&#8217;s 3G coverage is a little better than Vodafone&#8217;s &#8211; but both are far ahead of O2, whose coverage can at best be described as &#8220;fair&#8221;.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidglover.org/2010/05/comparing-the-ipad-3g-price-plans.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
